The Tour de France With Drugs?

Now we have something / quite-a-lot to discuss and celebrate.
Post Reply
Jughead
Posts: 211
Joined: 24 Dec 2012, 11:07pm

The Tour de France With Drugs?

Post by Jughead »

I need to admit that I'm not a fan of the TdF. However i recently saw the film with Lance Armstrong and his so called cheating. They use the word drugs and all of its negative conotations but it seemed to me that it was scientists being clever with improving human performance. They would cycle at altitude which produced blood they would take and later inject back in a race and give an advantage. No drugs. It would give the extra couple of percent that would make a difference.

This accounts for a small percentage of the effort required to win the TdF. It makes a small difference this so called cheating.

After watching the film, rather than despising Armstrong I was impressed at his work ethic.
rualexander
Posts: 2639
Joined: 2 Jul 2007, 9:47pm
Contact:

Re: The Tour de France With Drugs?

Post by rualexander »

There were 'drugs' involved as well as blood transfusions.
e.g. EPO http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erythropoietin
iviehoff
Posts: 2411
Joined: 20 Jan 2009, 4:38pm

Re: The Tour de France With Drugs?

Post by iviehoff »

Back in the 19th century, to train for a sporting contest was considered rather ungentlemanly. To some extent, once you have special diets, special clothes (esp swimming), altitude training, special equipment (which many sports then try to put a lid on to prevent it becoming a technical contest), etc, then techniques like re-transfusing your own blood seem but a very small logical progression, and drugs not so much more. In athletics they've got themselves in an awful tangle with (the terrible mistake of) letting Pistorius run with those blades - Pistorius isn't so special as an athlete and others are coming along who with such equipment will beat "able-bodied" athletes; is it legal to amputate and wear the blades, or do you have to have had a "genuine" accident/disease/deformity, because you will run faster after amputation. Perhaps at this point we realise that there does have to be a line drawn somewhere.
Psamathe
Posts: 17648
Joined: 10 Jan 2014, 8:56pm

Re: The Tour de France With Drugs?

Post by Psamathe »

I used to live in France (returned to UK 5 years ago) and even one year the TdF went through our local town. Everybody loved it but was absolutely clear in that they regarded it as a competition between pharmaceutical companies, not riders. Maybe things have changed more recently but I suspect that even if things are better, the "locals" have not yet changed their opinions.

(Just recounting my experience here as I don't really follow the TdF and have no personal opinion)

Ian
User avatar
Mick F
Spambuster
Posts: 56359
Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 11:24am
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall

Re: The Tour de France With Drugs?

Post by Mick F »

Yes, it's a fine line between equipment and training, and drugs and enhancements.
Mick F. Cornwall
Tizme
Posts: 119
Joined: 10 Apr 2012, 12:41pm

Re: The Tour de France With Drugs?

Post by Tizme »

The point with Lance Armstrong is that he maintained throughout his career he did not use drugs, he sued people who suggested it, he spent a large amount of money ensuring failed drug tests disappeared and made a very large fortune out of being a "clean" cyclist. Read David Walshs' "7 Deadly Sins" and you may change your opinion and I was a Lance fan for many years.
User avatar
TrevA
Posts: 3551
Joined: 1 Jun 2007, 9:12pm
Location: Nottingham

Re: The Tour de France With Drugs?

Post by TrevA »

Tyler Hamilton virtually bankrupted himself, trying to defend his good name in the courts, but all the time he knew that he'd been blood-doping and taking drugs. I think riders do it for so long, they no longer see it as cheating.
Sherwood CC and Notts CTC.
A cart horse trapped in the body of a man.
http://www.jogler2009.blogspot.com
pete75
Posts: 16370
Joined: 24 Jul 2007, 2:37pm

Re: The Tour de France With Drugs?

Post by pete75 »

iviehoff wrote: In athletics they've got themselves in an awful tangle with (the terrible mistake of) letting Pistorius run with those blades - Pistorius isn't so special as an athlete and others are coming along who with such equipment will beat "able-bodied" athletes; is it legal to amputate and wear the blades, or do you have to have had a "genuine" accident/disease/deformity, because you will run faster after amputation. Perhaps at this point we realise that there does have to be a line drawn somewhere.


Not bothered about him being in the running races just don't let him anywhere near the shooting...
'Give me my bike, a bit of sunshine - and a stop-off for a lunchtime pint - and I'm a happy man.' - Reg Baker
whiskywheels
Posts: 88
Joined: 1 Aug 2008, 5:41pm

Re: The Tour de France With Drugs?

Post by whiskywheels »

Jughead wrote:I need to admit that I'm not a fan of the TdF. However i recently saw the film with Lance Armstrong and his so called cheating. They use the word drugs and all of its negative conotations but it seemed to me that it was scientists being clever with improving human performance. They would cycle at altitude which produced blood they would take and later inject back in a race and give an advantage. No drugs. It would give the extra couple of percent that would make a difference.

This accounts for a small percentage of the effort required to win the TdF. It makes a small difference this so called cheating.

After watching the film, rather than despising Armstrong I was impressed at his work ethic.



It's good to read something sensible on this subject at last.
User avatar
jezer
Posts: 1581
Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 5:16pm
Location: North Wiltshire

Re: The Tour de France With Drugs?

Post by jezer »

I'm sure Armstrong was dedicated and trained hard to achieve what he did. What I find unforgivable is that he used the cancer ticket to make a fortune whilst cheating. That alone did great detriment to cycling in the minds of the general public :?
Power to the pedals
Post Reply