thidwick wrote:chocjohn9 wrote:Sorry to hear of your woes.....I'm not surprised that it was a BMW......they are more aggressive, for sure. A kind of "look at me, I've made it...ha ha and look at you on a bike" mentality...
Hey..... Less of the generalising. I have a BMW. It is highly reliable, cheap to run, comfortable, and takes the bike in the back or on the roof. Best of all it will sit quite happily on the drive for days and weeks, whilst I ride my bikes, until I need it. I don't believe I drive it aggressively. I look out for cyclists whilst I sing along to the rather excellent stereo.
I appreciate you may be the 'exception that proves the rule', but I'm afraid I'm with chocjohn here - I have more trouble with beemers and audis on average, than other makes. Incidentally, I have a Peugeot: it is highly reliable, cheap to run, comfortable, and takes the bike in the back (I don't have a roof carrier). Best of all it will sit quite happily on the drive for days and weeks, whilst I ride my bikes, until I need it . There's nothing about BMWs that singles them out as 'superior' vehicles. I had a colleague who bought a clapped-out old beemer (probably the best he could afford) and that car was no end of trouble: half the time he was late to work because his wheels wouldn't start, or had packed it in on the way to work or something. I believe it ended up on the dump.
Call it generalising if you must. I'm on extra alert whenever a car approaches which I recognise as a BMW or Audi.