1930s roads. Same old arguments?

Commuting, Day rides, Audax, Incidents, etc.
Post Reply
james01
Posts: 2116
Joined: 6 Aug 2007, 4:48am

1930s roads. Same old arguments?

Post by james01 »

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -hogs.html

Quite an old link, but fascinating to see the arguments against any speed limits put forward by the motoring lobby despite over 7,000 road deaths annually versus under 2,000 today.
mercalia
Posts: 14630
Joined: 22 Sep 2013, 10:03pm
Location: london South

Re: 1930s roads. Same old arguments?

Post by mercalia »

ah now I know from where the Belisha beacons got their name - Leslie Hore-Belisha, newly appointed Minister of Transport in the 30's
User avatar
ArMoRothair
Posts: 351
Joined: 20 Jun 2013, 10:55am
Location: Londinium

Re: 1930s roads. Same old arguments?

Post by ArMoRothair »

Almost an interesting DM article……..until you look at the comments "we should ban all women drivers".

I must remember to never read DM comments, ever.
Cyril Haearn
Posts: 15215
Joined: 30 Nov 2013, 11:26am

Re: 1930s roads. Same old arguments?

Post by Cyril Haearn »

Fewer than 2000 "accidental" deaths. But many many "only" seriously injured. Plenty of these die more than 30 days after the "accident". Many others will never be healthy again, many live for decades in a wheelchair or in bed, they can not cycle, read, work, they even need help to eat and drink and go to the toilet.

For me (no family, no children), maybe "worse than death".

One hardly ever sees these "survivors" because the pavements are blocked by parked cars so that wheelchairs must go on the road.

Makes one sick.
Entertainer, juvenile, curmudgeon, PoB, 30120
Cycling-of course, but it is far better on a Gillott
We love safety cameras, we hate bullies
Post Reply