Commuting lights

Commuting, Day rides, Audax, Incidents, etc.
User avatar
squeaker
Posts: 4113
Joined: 12 Jan 2007, 11:43pm
Location: Sussex

Re: Commuting lights

Post by squeaker »

Tonyf33 wrote:Hub dynamos:
Cannot be removed to another bike in seconds
? :roll: Still have a QR axle, just need to remember to 'pull the plug'. Arguably quicker than un-clipping a V-brake cable...
"42"
Brucey
Posts: 44643
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Commuting lights

Post by Brucey »

I agree with MJR & squeaker.

Tony's list is somewhat, uh, 'incomplete'... eg. battery lights 'don't slip' but the same is not mentioned for hub dynamos. Are we meant to infer that 'they slip'... :wink: :roll: ?

FWIW the 'added weight' of a hub dynamo system is about 1lb. If you carry 1 lb of similarly bright battery lights that might give you a run time of a few hours. That's if you remember to charge them up/change the batteries, you remember to take them with you, and they don't turn itself on in your bag and flatten the battery before you get a chance to use them....

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tangled Metal
Posts: 9509
Joined: 13 Feb 2015, 8:32pm

Re: Commuting lights

Post by Tangled Metal »

Well as posted earlier my Cateye lights last the 4.5 hours u commute in the dark each week. My rear light seems to last even longer. The issue I have, which prompted me starting this thread, is with my backups. They're cheap ALDI lights similar to some lights from Moon (equivalent quality to Cateye lights AFAIK). They are examples of poor battery lights. Basically I have lights that support arguments for and against battery lights.

This request for recommendations is for lights similar to the ALDI lights but more reliable. I'd like them to last about the same length of time or better, about 2-3 hours I think, but are more user friendly like the Cateye lights. These show you they are charging or charged when you plug in. They also indicate when they are running a bit low through a change in on/off button colour. Once they have passed that point they switch to a lower setting to get you home. IME the 300 lumen front light has enough juice to run another 15 minutes on full power then over half an hour on low setting. This is enough to get me halfway to work then home again without recharging. These.Cateye lights just work.

The x-lite x2 rear light attaches by a silicone band, several sizes to fit seat post or seat stay. It has a wide angle of visibility and 50 lumens easily makes it visible. The volt 300 front is bright.enough for me. The beam pattern seems to have a tight, bright centre with a lighter outer to it. It is attached to my handlebars off centre such that I can adjust the angle both horizontally and vertically. I often adjust down and to the pavement in town to prevent dazzling cars. Then up and centre on unlit roads where I'm riding at a greater speed.

So far with those Cateye lights I cannot fault in anyway. My only complaint is my x2 rear light needs an x spacer to allow it to be fitted to my preferred rear light location on the rear light plate of my rack. Nowhere seems to stock it with a long order time. Annoying, they should supply with the light IMHO even if the price went up by the couple of quid this bracket costs.

So should I find a Cateye light or is there any other good brand? It's for lights to be seen by as a second set, front and rear, to be used with my.main Cateye lights. Any suggestions for these that doesn't involve buying a special wheel and allows them to easily be used on another bike? My partner has Cateye brackets on her bike and sometimes when I'm not using my bike she is using hers hence something that she could use as well is useful.
pwa
Posts: 17403
Joined: 2 Oct 2011, 8:55pm

Re: Commuting lights

Post by pwa »

I'm sure you are thinking of something economical but, as an alternative approach, you might consider an admittedly expensive Hope Vision 1 light, taking AAs (or good quality rechargeables) and running for absolutely ages if on a lower setting. And it can step up to be your main beam if your existing light fails. I have one of the originals and have been using it for years in all sorts of weather. The robust clamp eventually broke, so I bought a new one from Hope at little cost. My wife is currently using it as her main beam for commuting. Made in Barnoldswick, not far from you.
Brucey
Posts: 44643
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Commuting lights

Post by Brucey »

Cateye are one of the better lamp brands; if you choose carefully you can even have lights that conform to some kind of regulation that means something rather than almost nothing....

If you are happy with the way they work and you want to be able to swap them about between bikes without too much faffing it probably makes sense to stick with them for now (you might yet 'see the light'... :wink: -give it a year or so... :lol: ).

There's a loads of cateye rear light brackets here;

http://www.sjscycles.co.uk/rear-light-brackets-dept784_pg1/#filterkey=brand&brand=CATEYE&page=all

maybe they have what you want?

BTW it is more or less traditional to do a little DIY where necessary with light brackets... where's the challenge in just bolting them on... :wink:

cheers
Last edited by Brucey on 20 Jan 2016, 9:08pm, edited 1 time in total.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tangled Metal
Posts: 9509
Joined: 13 Feb 2015, 8:32pm

Re: Commuting lights

Post by Tangled Metal »

If I expect to use lights then they're on the bike so unlikely to switch on. Besides you have to press and hold for a few seconds to turn on and from experience with backpacking head torches with similar switches I've never had a problem with.accidental switching with such switches.

IME of my Cateye lights I get a week of commuting per charge and they indicate when getting low with enough juice to get me home and even further if needed. It is hardly a chore to plug it in once a week either at home or at work. I have cables in both locations. Bearing in mind these are only used for commuting or as just in case lights on day rides.

They are light at 206g. Add moon comet lights, which.are very.similar to my ALDI lights and you get to 270g all in for 2 sets of lights. A little over half a pound. IIRC someone said a dynamo light system weighs a full pound or 453g.

How long to switch dynamo lights to another bike? Forgot to.mention that about using on another bike. 700 wheel to 26" wheel as well.

I'm not knocking dynamo lights just defending battery lights, which suit my needs more, as I feel both lights have benefits and negatives. As I expressed interest in learning more about dynamo systems because I can see.how they might be of use to me in.the future. Pros and cons in both systems.

For the needs I have, and expressed perhaps incompletely in my original post was for a set of battery lights. My preference is for a decent brand name such as Cateye, light in motion, moon, etc. I don't trust eBay products, I choose not to use eBay, so I'm looking for something from a bike shop ideally in.the UK.
Tonyf33
Posts: 3926
Joined: 17 Nov 2007, 3:31pm
Location: Letchworth N.Herts

Re: Commuting lights

Post by Tonyf33 »

Brucey wrote:I agree with MJR & squeaker.

Tony's list is somewhat, uh, 'incomplete'... eg. battery lights 'don't slip' but the same is not mentioned for hub dynamos. Are we meant to infer that 'they slip'... :wink: :roll: ?

FWIW the 'added weight' of a hub dynamo system is about 1lb. If you carry 1 lb of similarly bright battery lights that might give you a run time of a few hours. That's if you remember to charge them up/change the batteries, you remember to take them with you, and they don't turn itself on in your bag and flatten the battery before you get a chance to use them....

cheers

Incomplete in so much as the list further up was against battery lights, who said it was a complete list, the points raised are valid but feel fit to attack my post in your usual way that you do all posters you don't agree with. :roll:
Tonyf33
Posts: 3926
Joined: 17 Nov 2007, 3:31pm
Location: Letchworth N.Herts

Re: Commuting lights

Post by Tonyf33 »

mjr wrote:The following are not currently true in the majority of cases in my experience:
Tonyf33 wrote:Many of the good modern battery light systems have proper beam patterns, [...]
All modern battery light can be switched on and off with multiple settings at the press of a finger [...]
Have run times long enough for 99.99% of commuters/utility and touring types. [...]
Modern battery lights don't fail at speed or after suffering multiple shocks or bumps or from intense wet/cold over long periods of time and ARE reliable
Can be swapped between any bike you have within seconds without getting your hands dirty.
Do not slip

It's very hard to get a proper beam pattern light, most switches are still awful and bump-prone, the run times are barely long enough unless you recharge daily; and the brand-specific proprietary mounts are for silly places like handlebars and seatposts, slip easily and take an annoying amount of time to move between bikes.

Really, the main things in their favour are initial purchase cost and that annoying amount of time to move them between bikes is still less than it takes to remove/refit a dynamo set. The costs of a good hub is not so high and the drag while off is negligible.

As I said, those not having knowledge of good modern lights as I stated are out of touch with what's available, ALL of the statements made are true and valid, most switches are not 'bump prone' IME, that may apply to inferior/cheap lights but I'm not advocating those and certainly none I've ever purchased. As for the drag, I took the stats from a reliable source, I'd say that north of 5% of total effort is more than enough to make an impression. YMMV
User avatar
Vantage
Posts: 3050
Joined: 24 Jan 2012, 1:44pm
Location: somewhere in Bolton
Contact:

Re: Commuting lights

Post by Vantage »

Tonyf33 wrote:Battery lights:
Many of the good modern battery light systems have proper beam patterns, you can easily purchase a hood in any case and spill isn't enough to remove the ability to see the road in front in any case, clearly people don't know the market that well


Do you have a list of these lights? And the hoods for those that don't have shaped beams?

All modern battery light can be switched on and off with multiple settings at the press of a finger so no capacitor required


On and off is all that is needed. Mine go on when I pedal and off shortly after stopping. I haven't had to touch the switch in months. Flashy lights just annoy everyone having to look at them.

Have run times long enough for 99.99% of commuters/utility and touring types.


The very fact that they have run times is a miss. Dynamo's just run. And run. And run. And run. And run.

Modern battery lights don't fail at speed or after suffering multiple shocks or bumps or from intense wet/cold over long periods of time and ARE reliable


Modern dynamo's have over voltage protection.
One of the biggest problems with battery lights is that the AA/AAA and similar types have sprung contacts. Which can spring away from the battery causing loss of power. In the case of modern LED lights, even when the battery regains contact with the terminals the light does not turn back on automatically. It must be switched on via the power button and cycled through the countless flashy modes until the previously chosen mode is found.
Intense and even milder wet and cold weather frequently kills battery lights. The rubber seals can lose elasticity in cold and become useless. Water gets in even in mist and can short the battery contacts and/or circuit boards.

Can be swapped between any bike you have within seconds without getting your hands dirty.


Seconds is being optimistic even with the rubber band mounted lights.
Do not slip
Which tend to slip. Along with the plastic bracket mounted models.
Whereas my dynamo is fixed to a steel mount with a big steel bolt which is fixed to the fork crown with another big steel bolt. And doesn't move. At all.

Hub dynamos:

Cannot be removed to another bike in seconds


As above.

Have wheels/hub that are much heavier than a normal one


Much heavier? I have two front wheels. Both done by the same builder. Using the same type and number of spokes and using the same rims. The difference between the dyno hubbed one and the standard hubbed one is 397g. Less than half a bag of sugar. Here's the interesting bit...
The dynamo front and rear lights don't need batteries. So that weight can't be counted. However, the weight of my old cree front lights battery and two AA's for a battery rear light is 292g.
So in actual fact, the weight difference between the two wheels is only about 100g.

Are at least twice the cost of a very good battery light set and you end up with a cheap wheel/hub, if you want a decent set up make that three times the cost and up.


I had a look on Rose to compare the prices of my dyno lights verses their battery equivalents.
My dynamo's first...
http://www.rosebikes.com/article/b--m-t ... aid:378502
http://www.rosebikes.com/article/b--m-l ... aid:709237
and their battery powered cousins...
http://www.rosebikes.com/article/b--m-t ... aid:527826
http://www.rosebikes.com/article/b--m-i ... aid:703598 (That's as close to mine as I could find)
Soooooo, 74 euros ish. For each.
The only real price difference here is the cost of my handbuilt wheel comprising a 36 stainless spoked Sputnik rim and Shimano 3n72 hub. Not exactly a Halfords Apollo special. That was about £90 including building it. Just over a year old. Dragged through offroad rock strewn and muck plastered trails and Britains roads. Still perfectly true and running very smooth indeed. It's also powered my lights for that time which never ever need to hooked up to the mains for recharging or needing new batteries. Given that the battery powered version of my front light gets 5 hours at 80 lux according to the manufacturer, that's an aweful lot of paid for batteries or electricity through recharging I've saved. A 90 quid one off charge for the wheel doesn't seem too bad then.

Have drag on them all the time even when 'off', when they are on, an approximate 6-7 watt loss at 12.5mph as a commuter/utility rider knocking out only 75-80 watts is plenty enough to make a difference overall, as a loaded tourer or audaxer the consideration is different obviously.


Have you even used a dyno hub in the last few years? Or ever?
A fa*t in the opposite direction would cause more drag.
Last edited by Vantage on 20 Jan 2016, 10:29pm, edited 1 time in total.
Bill


“Ride as much or as little, or as long or as short as you feel. But ride.” ~ Eddy Merckx
It's a rich man whos children run to him when his pockets are empty.
Brucey
Posts: 44643
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Commuting lights

Post by Brucey »

as noted previously in this thread the vast majority of 'good modern battery lights' as bought by many cyclists are nowhere near meeting any kind of road regulations in force in the UK or elsewhere in the EU. Wrong beam shape, no side visibility... you name it.

If there were such a thing as 'a bicycle MOT' then bicycles equipped with such would fail, and quite rightly too.

Very many of the high power ones have antisocial beam patterns, and a good number of them are very poorly made indeed. They are OK for fooling around in the woods but past that... meh... not so much...

If anyone is happy to use unregulated antisocial junk on the roads then that is up to them. I don't think it is an altogether good idea to recommend that others do likewise, any more than it is OK to suggest that you run red lights or ride on the wrong side of the road.

This thread has been notable for the almost complete absence of suggestions for battery lights that actually meet the legal requirements for their use on the road.

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
on6702
Posts: 33
Joined: 27 Nov 2015, 12:47pm

Re: Commuting lights

Post by on6702 »

Interesting thread. As someone new to hub Dynamo lighting - my latest commuting bike (a cheap decathlon model) happened to come with it I have to say that I have been very impressed indeed and am now looking at upgrading my other bike as well. It's a true fit and forget solution and just removes any hassle with worrying about charging batteries and taking things on and off the bike and the quality of the illumination is very good. I think that when the dyno hubs used to be more expensive an argument could be made for staying with batteries but now given the affordability of it ( a new wheel plus good lights can be bought for < £100) I'm convinced that making the switch makes sense. Oliver
Tangled Metal
Posts: 9509
Joined: 13 Feb 2015, 8:32pm

Re: Commuting lights

Post by Tangled Metal »

So the weight difference between your own dynamo hub and normal hub wheels is 397g (about 2/3 of a pound). Then add the weight of your lights and wires to the total package. Well my whole rechargeable light package is only just over half a pound. Even without considering your actual light weight it's heavier.

This is not even the main point I have for choosing rechargeable battery lights, and it is a choice we make based on what our own priorities are, is for me they're simpler. Simple mount, different modes (which I use a lot), ability to use on other bikes, reliable (apart from the cheapest ALDI lights I own) and just simple. Go to shop, buy it then simple mount to use it.

The description of battery lights Vantage has given doesn't agree with my experience of them. I've no experience of dynamo light systems other than some very old and poor systems like bottle dynamo systems and an old hub system on a Dutch bike in.Holland years ago. I can't really comment on modern dynamo lighting system other to know that it doesn't suit my needs. I don't want a light system that's fixed solely to one bike. I'm looking for transferability. I like my Cateye lights because they work the way I like and expect from good, modern rechargeable lights. I'm just looking for something that behaves similar but with a different front light strength and beam pattern. It needs to charge in a way that shows it charging and when it's fully charged. I'd like it to indicate when the charge is low and to switch to a lower setting that gets me home if I have misjudged the amount of charge left.

Now to all those who have obsessed about dynamo lighting systems please answer the question. What recommendations do you have to match my needs. Clue, if it involves dynamo it's the wrong answer. I need a rechargeable ideally but have good experiences of my old Cateye el130 aa battery light.

You know what what I might just splash out on some moon comet lights, the Cateye el135 or the volt 300/x2 setup I already have. Or just a spare battery for the volt with a second x2. Got an x-lite (predecessor to x2 light) but the rubber back was lost. Could replace the backing and use.that.

Any other ideas?
User avatar
[XAP]Bob
Posts: 19800
Joined: 26 Sep 2008, 4:12pm

Re: Commuting lights

Post by [XAP]Bob »

And run times are only long enough for those taking the time to carry the battery indoors, charge it and return it to the bike absolutely without fail...
A shortcut has to be a challenge, otherwise it would just be the way. No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
Brucey
Posts: 44643
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Commuting lights

Post by Brucey »

for 'backup lights' I'd suggest that you consider non-rechargeable blinky ones, of relatively low power, and that you fit them with relatively inexpensive batteries. The reasons for this are that

1) they can still have a run time of about 100 hours or so and
2) boring old zinc-carbon batteries have a couple of redeeming characteristics that make them work quite well in such applications; first, they have about x4 the capacity ( vs as measured in a 'drain in three hours' type application) when discharged over a longer time period, and
3) they give out slowly, gradually losing voltage as time goes on. If you check them at the end of each ride for dimming you are unlikely to be caught out. (This contrasts with the behaviour of alkaline or rechargeable cells which can clap out very quickly.)
4) they are backup lights; they don't need to be that good?
5) for a couple of quid you can buy about two year's worth of batteries for them.
6) The used cells can be recycled and don't contain such harmful metals as some.
7) they are small and light, why not fit two 'backup lights' at the rear?

The trick here is finding the right balance between price and quality. I have had several EL130/135 front lights and they have been OK for what they are, far from the worst lights out there. I don't think the brackets are that great (the thing that retains the thumbwheel tends to fall out, as does the pivot screw) and they variously broke in interesting ways... but I've seen worse.

Beware blinkies that, once you go over a bump, switch themselves off; at one time quite a lot were like that, and it can be a fatal flaw for a rear light. Best to test what happens if the battery is disconnected momentarily when the light is on.

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
User avatar
gaz
Posts: 14657
Joined: 9 Mar 2007, 12:09pm
Location: Kent

Re: Commuting lights

Post by gaz »

Tangled Metal wrote:Any other ideas?

I use a Philips Saferide Gen 1. Even though there are diminishing stocks of this out of production lamp I'd still recommend reading this review before buying. My own opinions here.

To the rear I have a Cateye TL-AU100 BS to be legal (out of production, crop up on ebay NOS from time to time) and a Cateye TL-LD1100. The AU100 has been reliable but isn't the brightest. LD1100 is brighter but managed to switch itself on in the pannier today.

Incidentally I expect my next purchase to be a hub dynamo and suitable lights :wink: .

Edit: OP's existing Cateye Volt becomes the back up.
Last edited by gaz on 21 Jan 2016, 9:52am, edited 1 time in total.
High on a cocktail of flossy teacakes and marmalade
Post Reply