mjr wrote:MikeF wrote:However with light controlled crossings pedestrians have to wait until the lights change which has changed priorities from pedestrian to vehicle ie vehicles have priority with lights, and pedestrians have to wait, but with zebra crossings pedestrians don't have to wait.No, you don't have to wait until the lights change, but good luck asserting priority over steaming A-road motor traffic. I agree the best solution is prompt changes, but any requests for it are rejected.
Well yes you are strictly correct in that pedestrians always have priority over vehicle traffic! And also don't assume motor vehicles will stop at red traffic lights - that is one of the problems with light controlled crossings as well as zebras. Motorists ignore the Highway Code.
mjr wrote:....... I'm pretty sure that new zebras have also been installed in Norwich over the last few years including Chapelfield North and Theatre Street and more are planned, but I think they still shy away from creating new ones across A or B roads.
You may be correct in noting that zebras aren't installed on A roads as in my above example. Any examples of zebra crossings on A roads?
I presume that's tongue in cheek??johncarnie wrote:The latest crossings to be installed in Worcester are the "pedestrian friendly" Puffin crossings:
Any controlled crossing other than a zebra is designed to smooth vehicle traffic flow. Only a zebra is actually pedestrian friendly.
Examples of wording in describing puffin crossings
Vehicle users given clear signal when to stop for pedestrians - Vehicle users always have to stop for pedestrians!!!!!
Can help maintain vehicle traffic flow in busy pedestrian areas when a Zebra crossing would cause traffic delays - It's official! Priority changed to vehicles.