Motor insurance:

Commuting, Day rides, Audax, Incidents, etc.

Moderators: Si, Simon L6, Graham, Spam Busters

Motor insurance:

Postby [XAP]Bob » Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:27 am

Motor Insurers' Bureau wrote:
  • 1 in 10 18-34 year old drivers are unaware that car insurance is a legal requirement
  • 3 in 4 drivers are currently looking for ways to reduce motor insurance costs
  • About 900,000 drivers under the age of 30 are currently driving without insurance
  • 60% of drivers think they are likely to be caught and only 7% are aware of all the possible consequences when they are caught.


How can 10% of 18-34 year old drivers not know that insurance is a legal requirement?
Last edited by [XAP]Bob on Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
A shortcut has to be a challenge, otherwise it would just be the way.

You don't use science to show that you're right, you use science to become right.
User avatar
[XAP]Bob
 
Posts: 1341
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 4:12 pm

Re: Motor insurance:

Postby ANTONISH » Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:46 am

[quote="[XAP]Bob
How can 10% of 18-34 year old drivers not know that insurance is a legal requirement?
[/quote]
Perhaps they don't want to know - funny how they know that cyclists are in the wrong for "not paying insurance"
Also many drivers have strange ideas about the content of the highway code.
ANTONISH
 
Posts: 276
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:49 am

Re: Motor insurance:

Postby gbnz » Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:50 am

[XAP]Bob wrote:
How can 10% of 18-34 year old drivers not know that insurance is a legal requirement?


Well insurance is fairly irrelevant. If you haven't got a licence, the vehicle doesn't belong to you, it's got no MOT, the brakes don't work, etc, etc, etc

Given we live in a two tier society, I'm far happier now that I no longer have to manage and deal with members from the lower tier.
gbnz
 
Posts: 430
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 10:38 am

Re: Motor insurance:

Postby Swizz69 » Wed Feb 10, 2010 8:41 pm

gbnz wrote: If you haven't got a licence

There is a column in our local free rag which lists a chunk of the weeks court convictions, and have lost count of how many times I've read, "Driving without a License - received fine and a 12 months ban." Okaaaaay... :lol:
"It's a.. robot?"

"Yes Geoffrey, the clue is in the name, do keep up. Designed to look like any ordinary cyclist. A bit shifty, dressed in funny clothes that no self-respecting human adult should ever consider. It even has a 'smug' mode.
User avatar
Swizz69
 
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:25 am
Location: Hyde

Re: Motor insurance:

Postby benm » Wed Feb 10, 2010 9:30 pm

Swizz69 wrote:
gbnz wrote: If you haven't got a licence

There is a column in our local free rag which lists a chunk of the weeks court convictions, and have lost count of how many times I've read, "Driving without a License - received fine and a 12 months ban." Okaaaaay... :lol:


IIRC an offender can't be sent down for driving without a license, however driving whilst banned (with or without a license) is a more serious offence for which custody is not ruled out - I guess it is, in effect, contempt of court. So if your ned gets caught whilst banned even though he doesn't have a license... down he goes :D

B.
User avatar
benm
 
Posts: 134
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:39 am

Re: Motor insurance:

Postby Mick F » Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:47 pm

18 to 34 year olds?
Maybe I could understand 18 to 22 year olds.
Mick F. Cornwall
User avatar
Mick F
Spambuster
 
Posts: 13327
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 12:24 pm
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall

Re: Motor insurance:

Postby gilesjuk » Thu Feb 11, 2010 12:16 am

Perhaps it's something they should include in the driving test?

Not that all people with a licence took the test anyway, there are people who will do that for you (illegally).
gilesjuk
 
Posts: 1827
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 11:10 pm

Re: Motor insurance:

Postby Swizz69 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 2:29 am

Mick F wrote:18 to 34 year olds?

Erm, Jeremy Kyle's guests?
"It's a.. robot?"

"Yes Geoffrey, the clue is in the name, do keep up. Designed to look like any ordinary cyclist. A bit shifty, dressed in funny clothes that no self-respecting human adult should ever consider. It even has a 'smug' mode.
User avatar
Swizz69
 
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:25 am
Location: Hyde

Re: Motor insurance:

Postby FatBat » Thu Feb 11, 2010 11:48 am

Back when I was learning to drive, the instructor said that insurance was not actually compulsory - if you could prove that you had a large enough pot of spare money to cover any claims that could be made against you, you didn't need insurance. In effect, you had insured yourself. Whetherthis is still the case, I don't know. I guess that the pot of cash would have to be very big - the claim against that chap who caused the Great Heck rail crash must have been huge - ten fatalities and two trains written off.
FatBat
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:06 pm

Re: Motor insurance:

Postby [XAP]Bob » Thu Feb 11, 2010 12:17 pm

FatBat wrote:Back when I was learning to drive, the instructor said that insurance was not actually compulsory - if you could prove that you had a large enough pot of spare money to cover any claims that could be made against you, you didn't need insurance. In effect, you had insured yourself. Whetherthis is still the case, I don't know. I guess that the pot of cash would have to be very big - the claim against that chap who caused the Great Heck rail crash must have been huge - ten fatalities and two trains written off.


You don't just have to have a big enough pot, I assume you could deposit said pot with an insurance company, they'll insure you for £10m with a £10m excess quite cheaply...

Or register as an insurance company - but that requires reinsurance...
A shortcut has to be a challenge, otherwise it would just be the way.

You don't use science to show that you're right, you use science to become right.
User avatar
[XAP]Bob
 
Posts: 1341
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 4:12 pm

Re: Motor insurance:

Postby Tonyf33 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:18 pm

I'm not surprised at the figures to be honest, it doesn't say which cross section across the age range it is from. As for not having insurance directly through a normal insurer, theoretically possible over here but a bit of a long winded & risky way to cover yourself and third parties.

The state of California offers you the option of a surety bond, proof of cash deposit lodged with the DMV or self insured certificate as an alternative to std car insurance.
Tonyf33
 
Posts: 960
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 4:31 pm
Location: Letchworth N.Herts

Re: Motor insurance:

Postby sarahinaberdeen » Fri Feb 12, 2010 12:31 am

gilesjuk wrote:Perhaps it's something they should include in the driving test?.


It's in the theory test. But it depends on whether you pass it by chance or by studying and if you retain any of the information.
sarahinaberdeen
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:57 pm


Return to On the road

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests