The dangers of household furniture
The dangers of household furniture
It used to be said that beds were more dangerous than bicycles. I have to report that is no longer the case. However, falls from furniture as a whole killed more people than cycling injuries, in the UK in 2009.
Mortalities:
Pedal cyclist injured in transport accident: 113
Fall involving bed: 100
Fall involving chair: 46
Fall involving other furniture: 2
Total falls from all furniture: 148
The pedants among you might argue that people spend more time on furniture than bikes, so the risk per exposure is lower for furniture, but why spoil a good story?
From "Mortality statistics: Deaths registered in 2009" (http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/ ... /dr-09.pdf), table 5.19.
Mortalities:
Pedal cyclist injured in transport accident: 113
Fall involving bed: 100
Fall involving chair: 46
Fall involving other furniture: 2
Total falls from all furniture: 148
The pedants among you might argue that people spend more time on furniture than bikes, so the risk per exposure is lower for furniture, but why spoil a good story?
From "Mortality statistics: Deaths registered in 2009" (http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/ ... /dr-09.pdf), table 5.19.
Re: The dangers of household furniture
Nice stats though
A shortcut has to be a challenge, otherwise it would just be the way. No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
Re: The dangers of household furniture
Wonderfulsnibgo wrote:The pedants among you might argue that people spend more time on furniture than bikes, so the risk per exposure is lower for furniture, but why spoil a good story?
Mick F. Cornwall
Re: The dangers of household furniture
Bed... thats what I need..
- hubgearfreak
- Posts: 8212
- Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 4:14pm
Re: The dangers of household furniture
it's not just that we spend less time on our bikes than we do in bed or on a chair. just about everyone uses beds and chairs but there's less of us that use bikes.
however, you'd have to be a right old pedant to point that out
however, you'd have to be a right old pedant to point that out
- hubgearfreak
- Posts: 8212
- Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 4:14pm
Re: The dangers of household furniture
downfader wrote:Bed... thats what I need..
be careful
Re: The dangers of household furniture
snibgo wrote:The pedants among you might argue that people spend more time on furniture than bikes, so the risk per exposure is lower for furniture, but why spoil a good story?
Not sure - how long do you spend getting out of bed each day - maybe 5 seconds? (Assuming that all falls where as a result of trying to get out of course)
I reckon that even with the large number of non cyclists we still all average more than 5 seconds on the bike each day...
Old DfT stats '99-'01 suggest ~40miles a year average on the bike - at 15mph that's 2hours 40 minutes = 9600 seconds or 26 seconds a day (let's round that to 30 shall we?)
So unless you spend more than 30 seconds a day getting out of bed, you are at more risk getting out of bed than (transport) cycling...
Last edited by [XAP]Bob on 9 Jan 2011, 8:39pm, edited 1 time in total.
A shortcut has to be a challenge, otherwise it would just be the way. No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
Re: The dangers of household furniture
[XAP]Bob wrote:snibgo wrote:The pedants among you might argue that people spend more time on furniture than bikes, so the risk per exposure is lower for furniture, but why spoil a good story?
Not sure - how long do you spend getting out of bed each day - maybe 5 seconds?
I reckon that even with the large number of non cyclists we still all average more than 5 seconds on the bike each day...
Actually thats true.. its the time travelled thats the problem. When you're IN the bed you (usually) aint moving (ahem), but getting in and out takes less time than a ride...
Re: The dangers of household furniture
downfader wrote:[XAP]Bob wrote:snibgo wrote:The pedants among you might argue that people spend more time on furniture than bikes, so the risk per exposure is lower for furniture, but why spoil a good story?
Not sure - how long do you spend getting out of bed each day - maybe 5 seconds?
I reckon that even with the large number of non cyclists we still all average more than 5 seconds on the bike each day...
Actually thats true.. its the time travelled thats the problem. When you're IN the bed you (usually) aint moving (ahem), but getting in and out takes less time than a ride...
Sorry - just updated my post
A shortcut has to be a challenge, otherwise it would just be the way. No situation is so dire that panic cannot make it worse.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are two kinds of people in this world: those can extrapolate from incomplete data.
Re: The dangers of household furniture
Good point about the exposure risk. Being in bed doesn't kill us (even though that's where most of us will die), but getting in and out might, and that action is more dangerous than cycling.
Another obvious thought occurs. How do people die from falling out of (or even into or across) their beds? I reckon they must bang their heads. So we could save 100 lives a year if we insisted that before they go to bed, everyone should put on a ..., well, shall we say "protection".
Another obvious thought occurs. How do people die from falling out of (or even into or across) their beds? I reckon they must bang their heads. So we could save 100 lives a year if we insisted that before they go to bed, everyone should put on a ..., well, shall we say "protection".
Re: The dangers of household furniture
snibgo wrote:Good point about the exposure risk. Being in bed doesn't kill us (even though that's where most of us will die), but getting in and out might, and that action is more dangerous than cycling.
Another obvious thought occurs. How do people die from falling out of (or even into or across) their beds? I reckon they must bang their heads. So we could save 100 lives a year if we insisted that before they go to bed, everyone should put on a ..., well, shall we say "protection".
If their room is anything like mine there will be numerous trip hazards.
Re: The dangers of household furniture
Of course, the main problem with using these stats as an assessment of risk is that most of those dying in these situations are the very elderly or the very young. So comparing their risk with cyclists is a complete waste of time
Re: The dangers of household furniture
Ellieb wrote:Of course, the main problem with using these stats as an assessment of risk is that most of those dying in these situations are the very elderly or the very young. So comparing their risk with cyclists is a complete waste of time
This elderly cyclist recently fell out of bed. I was staying with my Sister and the bed was higher than my own. Waking up with cramp I put my foot to the floor which wasn't where I expected it to be. Hence a fall onto a tiled floor- no injury fortunately
- hubgearfreak
- Posts: 8212
- Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 4:14pm
Re: The dangers of household furniture
Ellieb wrote:Of course, the main problem with using these stats as an assessment of risk is that most of those dying in these situations are the very elderly or the very young.
not the very young, they can be dropped from bed height entirely unhurt. you'd need to create a fall that's far higher than even the tallest bed to break one i reckon. i base this on having two sons, one's 6 and the other 19 months and they keep trying to break themselves on beds, on stairs, off chairs & etc.
Re: The dangers of household furniture
If you analyse these stats on the basis of distance travelled then the furniture risks are appaling compared with cycling.