professorlandslide wrote:aesmith wrote:Unfortunately everyone who chooses a helmet weakens our position, whether or not they speak up for freedom of choice.
Riight... So if i choose to wear a lid its incrementally making you wear one? Ookay.
Well, isn't it? Here the official line is that a "prudent cyclist" - one who wants to receive the full backing of the law - MUST wear a helmet.
There is no requirement to wear one but the attitude of insurers, police and judiciary, and society at large says otherwise.
Yet all the scientific brilliance of the western world, backed by the money of the helmet manufacturers has failed to show any significant benefit to wearing a helmet. In countries where lots of people cycle (and consequently, cycle in safety) the idea of wearing a helmet for something less dangerous than walking to the corner shop is bizarre. In the UK most people would be amazed if you told them that bare-headed cycling is statistically the safest way to get around.
Sadly, I wear a helmet to remove one excuse from the victim blamers and myself contribute to this growing problem
