deliquium wrote:Sad to see attention to front mudguard fitting - and advertising it - so 'compromised', from the usually great gang from Harrogate.
http://www.spacycles.co.uk/products.php ... b0s21p3104
That is one fugly bike.
deliquium wrote:Sad to see attention to front mudguard fitting - and advertising it - so 'compromised', from the usually great gang from Harrogate.
http://www.spacycles.co.uk/products.php ... b0s21p3104
honesty wrote:Whilst I can see the attraction and the intended use it goes too far towards the mountain bike for me. I want a Spa roughstuff with disc mounts, but I accept I'm in a definite minority!
reohn2 wrote:honesty wrote:Whilst I can see the attraction and the intended use it goes too far towards the mountain bike for me. I want a Spa roughstuff with disc mounts, but I accept I'm in a definite minority!
And a longer headtube
BrianP wrote:Any geometry numbers yet?
The Computer Monkey wrote:BrianP wrote:Any geometry numbers yet?
They are at the link below for now.
http://www.spacycles.co.uk/smsimg/adventure_sizing.jpg
BrianP wrote:An option of a well chosen carbon disc fork would be good too. Would be half the weight of steel and a nice titanium frame deserve a top fork.
Brian.
BrianP wrote:Look good to me too, perhaps just a tad longer head tube
........ Close to AWOL and my Fargo.
Brian
The Computer Monkey wrote:BrianP wrote:Any geometry numbers yet?
They are at the link below for now.
http://www.spacycles.co.uk/smsimg/adventure_sizing.jpg
BrianP wrote:What is the max tyre width?