Spa Ti Adventure

For discussions about bikes and equipment.
User avatar
Audax67
Posts: 6035
Joined: 25 Aug 2011, 9:02am
Location: Alsace, France
Contact:

Re: Spa Ti Adventure

Post by Audax67 »

deliquium wrote:Sad to see attention to front mudguard fitting - and advertising it - so 'compromised', from the usually great gang from Harrogate. :(

http://www.spacycles.co.uk/products.php ... b0s21p3104


That is one fugly bike.
Have we got time for another cuppa?
User avatar
honesty
Posts: 2658
Joined: 16 Mar 2012, 3:33pm
Location: Somerset
Contact:

Re: Spa Ti Adventure

Post by honesty »

Whilst I can see the attraction and the intended use it goes too far towards the mountain bike for me. I want a Spa roughstuff with disc mounts, but I accept I'm in a definite minority!
BrianP
Posts: 194
Joined: 14 Apr 2011, 9:12am

Re: Spa Ti Adventure

Post by BrianP »

Any geometry numbers yet?

Brian
reohn2
Posts: 45186
Joined: 26 Jun 2009, 8:21pm

Re: Spa Ti Adventure

Post by reohn2 »

honesty wrote:Whilst I can see the attraction and the intended use it goes too far towards the mountain bike for me. I want a Spa roughstuff with disc mounts, but I accept I'm in a definite minority!

And a longer headtube :)
-----------------------------------------------------------
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
User avatar
honesty
Posts: 2658
Joined: 16 Mar 2012, 3:33pm
Location: Somerset
Contact:

Re: Spa Ti Adventure

Post by honesty »

reohn2 wrote:
honesty wrote:Whilst I can see the attraction and the intended use it goes too far towards the mountain bike for me. I want a Spa roughstuff with disc mounts, but I accept I'm in a definite minority!

And a longer headtube :)

Nah. That's what spacers are for! ;)
BrianP
Posts: 194
Joined: 14 Apr 2011, 9:12am

Re: Spa Ti Adventure

Post by BrianP »

An option of a well chosen carbon disc fork would be good too. Would be half the weight of steel and a nice titanium frame deserve a top fork.

Brian.
User avatar
The Computer Monkey
Posts: 13
Joined: 21 Dec 2012, 9:41am
Location: Harrogate
Contact:

Re: Spa Ti Adventure

Post by The Computer Monkey »

BrianP wrote:Any geometry numbers yet?


They are at the link below for now.

http://www.spacycles.co.uk/smsimg/adventure_sizing.jpg
I'll raise my hands and say I work at Spa, however my views are my own. Just because I've said it doesn't mean anyone else will agree.
reohn2
Posts: 45186
Joined: 26 Jun 2009, 8:21pm

Re: Spa Ti Adventure

Post by reohn2 »

The Computer Monkey wrote:
BrianP wrote:Any geometry numbers yet?


They are at the link below for now.

http://www.spacycles.co.uk/smsimg/adventure_sizing.jpg



Good sensible solid figures those for such a bike IMHO :)
Best of luck with it :D
-----------------------------------------------------------
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
User avatar
cycleruk
Posts: 6071
Joined: 17 Jan 2009, 9:30pm
Location: Lancashire

Re: Spa Ti Adventure

Post by cycleruk »

BrianP wrote:An option of a well chosen carbon disc fork would be good too. Would be half the weight of steel and a nice titanium frame deserve a top fork.

Brian.


Personally I wouldn't want a carbon fork on a bike that may be subjected to rough stuff.
You'll never know if you don't try it.
BrianP
Posts: 194
Joined: 14 Apr 2011, 9:12am

Re: Spa Ti Adventure

Post by BrianP »

Thanks for posting geometries. Look good to me too, perhaps just a tad longer head tube, and resulting slightly higher stack. Close to AWOL and my Fargo.

What is the max tyre width?

Brian
mnichols
Posts: 1465
Joined: 22 Apr 2013, 4:29pm

Re: Spa Ti Adventure

Post by mnichols »

I'm interested in getting an off road touring bike. Two questions:

Wouldn't a rohloff hub be more robust than a deralieur?
I have and love my ti bike, but is steel better for out of the way places as its easier to repair?
reohn2
Posts: 45186
Joined: 26 Jun 2009, 8:21pm

Re: Spa Ti Adventure

Post by reohn2 »

BrianP wrote:Look good to me too, perhaps just a tad longer head tube

The headtube's high enough IMO and it needs to be short to accommodate the suspension corrected fork,which offers the option of a sus fork if required.

........ Close to AWOL and my Fargo.

Brian


It's a lot more Fargo (with a slacker s/t angle which is in it's favour) than AWOL or Vaya FTM.
-----------------------------------------------------------
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
Jezrant
Posts: 884
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 8:11pm

Re: Spa Ti Adventure

Post by Jezrant »

The Computer Monkey wrote:
BrianP wrote:Any geometry numbers yet?


They are at the link below for now.

http://www.spacycles.co.uk/smsimg/adventure_sizing.jpg


An intriguing design. The ever-useful yojimg trail calculator gives the small size a whopping 79mm trail with the 26 x 2" Mondials and 75mm trail in the larger sizes with the 700 x 40mm tyres.
User avatar
The Computer Monkey
Posts: 13
Joined: 21 Dec 2012, 9:41am
Location: Harrogate
Contact:

Re: Spa Ti Adventure

Post by The Computer Monkey »

BrianP wrote:What is the max tyre width?


It's designed to take a 58mm tyre in the frame i.e. a 2.3

I've run a Continental Mountain King MK1 2.2 in the rear and clearances were ample.
I'll raise my hands and say I work at Spa, however my views are my own. Just because I've said it doesn't mean anyone else will agree.
djnotts
Posts: 3067
Joined: 26 May 2008, 12:51pm
Location: Nottingham

Re: Spa Ti Adventure

Post by djnotts »

"That is one fugly bike."

Eye of the beholder an' all that - I think it is a real good looker and, as far as one can tell without riding it, one of the best "just a bicycle" out there. Wish I had reason to own one - surely a bargain.
Post Reply