is frame size that important?

For discussions about bikes and equipment.
chesterpete
Posts: 148
Joined: 9 Mar 2010, 3:43pm

is frame size that important?

Post by chesterpete »

My other half recently bought a rather nice Dawes Nomad and shes not getting on with it. I quite like it so am thinking of taking it on. The thing is the frame is 18 inch (46cm) and my other bikes have 54cm frames. I can set the Dawes up so that seat height, reach etc match my current bikes and the crank arms are the same length - so are there likely to be any issues I should be aware of?

Apologies if this is a daft question :)
Brucey
Posts: 44705
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: is frame size that important?

Post by Brucey »

if all the contact points are in the right places, it doesn't really matter all that much what is inbetween, 'specially with aluminium frames sloping top tubes etc. Lightweight steel ones feel different in different sizes (bit smaller = bit stiffer usually), but aluminium ones tend not to flex much at all, so there is less difference in feel between sizes. There are various other small differences like wheelbase, but they are just that; small, between sizes.

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
mig
Posts: 2705
Joined: 19 Oct 2011, 9:39pm

Re: is frame size that important?

Post by mig »

is the handlebar stem on the smaller frame now very long though? that can alter the steering feel.
chesterpete
Posts: 148
Joined: 9 Mar 2010, 3:43pm

Re: is frame size that important?

Post by chesterpete »

mig wrote:is the handlebar stem on the smaller frame now very long though? that can alter the steering feel.


Thanks chaps. In answer to the question - it has an adjustable stem (although i'm not a great fan tbh) - and the std stem will raise the bars sufficiently.
User avatar
531colin
Posts: 16148
Joined: 4 Dec 2009, 6:56pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: is frame size that important?

Post by 531colin »

Well, that makes a change!

Image

Seat angle is steeper on the bigger sizes, head angle slacker (if the table is right!)

Top tube is the same length on 18" as 20", and only half an inch longer on the 22"

If its comfortable, who cares?
reohn2
Posts: 45186
Joined: 26 Jun 2009, 8:21pm

Re: is frame size that important?

Post by reohn2 »

Colin
Wierdest set of angles :?
-----------------------------------------------------------
"All we are not stares back at what we are"
W H Auden
User avatar
531colin
Posts: 16148
Joined: 4 Dec 2009, 6:56pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: is frame size that important?

Post by 531colin »

I thought you'd like the 75deg seat tube.....
User avatar
breakwellmz
Posts: 1982
Joined: 8 May 2012, 9:33pm

Re: is frame size that important?

Post by breakwellmz »

Look at the shallow seat tube angle on the blue one compared to the other two-Why?

http://three60sports.co.uk/2012/02/07/p ... s-are-you/
Brucey
Posts: 44705
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: is frame size that important?

Post by Brucey »

'cause the handlebars are meant to be higher?

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
User avatar
Mick F
Spambuster
Posts: 56367
Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 11:24am
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall

Re: is frame size that important?

Post by Mick F »

Nice picture Colin, but where's G?
Mick F. Cornwall
User avatar
breakwellmz
Posts: 1982
Joined: 8 May 2012, 9:33pm

Re: is frame size that important?

Post by breakwellmz »

Brucey wrote:'cause the handlebars are meant to be higher?

cheers


It`s not just my eyes is it?
There looks to about a 5 degree difference between them?
69(Degrees!) on the blue one?
Brucey
Posts: 44705
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: is frame size that important?

Post by Brucey »

no, I agree the angles are different, slacker, but a lot of old-style roadsters have slack angles like that....

cheers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
User avatar
531colin
Posts: 16148
Joined: 4 Dec 2009, 6:56pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: is frame size that important?

Post by 531colin »

Mick F wrote:Nice picture Colin, but where's G?


G is standover height.....
Its under your.......you know where its under, Mick!

I particularly liked "fork offset" (F) being the wrong side of the fork..........
User avatar
Mick F
Spambuster
Posts: 56367
Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 11:24am
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall

Re: is frame size that important?

Post by Mick F »

I know what Standover Height is of course, but it's listed and not labeled.

I would also say that BB height is important, not just BB Drop. I know the two are connected via the wheel diameter, but the figure is important because it dictates the height of the saddle and whether your feet can reach the ground or you pedals bash the road on corners.
Mick F. Cornwall
User avatar
RickH
Posts: 5839
Joined: 5 Mar 2012, 6:39pm
Location: Horwich, Lancs.

Re: is frame size that important?

Post by RickH »

Mick F wrote:I would also say that BB height is important, not just BB Drop. I know the two are connected via the wheel diameter, but the figure is important because it dictates the height of the saddle and whether your feet can reach the ground or you pedals bash the road on corners.

But BB drop is a fixed measurement whereas the BB height will vary (possibly by as much as couple of cm) depending on the wheels & tyres fitted. If stated the BB height has to include what size of tyres (& possibly size of rim).

Rick
Former member of the Cult of the Polystyrene Head Carbuncle.
Post Reply