Moderators: Si, Graham, Vorpal, Spam Busters
TonyR wrote:@Brucey. You could say that since virtually all the top ten placed riders in the TdeF in that period have since been caught or strongly implicated in doping (which is one of the main reasons the titles have not been reallocated) then it was the whole sport not a single rider that was devalued.
Mick F wrote:If drug-taking was rife, surely it was a fair contest?
They "all" took 'em, so it's a fair race?
Chris Boardman never did more than win a few prologues.
Si wrote:Chris Boardman never did more than win a few prologues.
I think you do him a bit of a disservice there! He did win some prestigious stage races, not to mention medals in Olympics and Worlds(?) TTs, and the hour record, but never a grand tour.
The irony being IIRC that he had to give up because he needed to take banned-list drugs for medical reasons and so couldn't continue with his cycling and have his treatment.
gerrythemerc wrote:Surely it is wrong to single out Armstrong as has been done in the sensation seeking media.
Mick F wrote:If drug-taking was rife, surely it was a fair contest?
They "all" took 'em, so it's a fair race?
Brucey wrote:in a semi-conscious state this morning I heard the BBC news which -if my half-sleeping brain got it right- indicated that LA was offered a plea bargain by the US authorities; roughly fess up for one year's drug use, lose that Tour title, keep the rest. Or we'll strip you of every tour title. Which they did.
Not that it makes any difference, but I wonder why he didn't take the deal?
cheers
Return to Racing, Olympics, TdF, Competitive cycling
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest