Dave W wrote:Very true, particularly about the Garmin but they have proved reliable and many use nothing else. I never carry maps on the bike for a day ride, my son never carries a map in the car. Most of us would have a phone with Google maps as a back up also.
I agree most people these days do.
I'm on holiday ATM,yesterday I was on a 70mile journey with my SinL,he was using his smart phone for navigating,at one point he lost the signal at a point where he had to turn off the road we were on.I know the area,he doesn't,and was able to tell him to make a turn,his phone would have re routed him when the signal was regained but until then he would've been goosed if I hadn't been sat beside him.
Further into the journey he got a phone call(hands free via bluetooth I might add)again the mapping signal was interrupted,luckily this time we didn't need to turn off the road we were on.
The point I'm making is that electronics rely on other electronic chains that can break.
Mechanical chains(not just literally) can break but are fixable with knowledge and a bit of nous or a couple of small spares.
Electric shifting is very new but seems to have been reliable so far, if your battery were to fail I imagine you still have a gear of some sorts, no worse than a broken rear deralier.
Obviously the price is ridiculous for your average cyclist but I would expect this to drop considerably in time. The bike I had a go on was an ex demo carbon Focus, they wanted about £2000 for it or there abouts.
I wonder, if in the future the price point became very close to that of mechanical shifting whether the choice for many would be different. Maybe if they can't reduce the cost then it will fade away but having seen how most technology progresses maybe it's here to stay? Shimano aren't the only manufacturer on the bandwaggon.
See above for electronic chains,in the case of EGS,should it fail for whatever reason the roadside fixability is limited,to one gear.
With mechanical gear shifting,other than a complete mech mangle,some gears will be available if only two or three via the front mech because it's two separate and independent simple systems,there is a beauty in this realised by long time users of it,that is what's being argued,furthermore if that mechanical system is Shimano and 9sp or less any rear mech(bar some old obscure Dura Ace mechs) from Tourney at about £7 a pop to DuraAce,think of a number and double it
,can be used to get the tourist out of the mire.
If EGS becomes as cheap as present mechanical shifting many will buy it but it still won't eliminate it's inherent problems which are like the little girl with the curl.
PS disc brakes aren't lighter either but they seem to be the future on lightweight road bikes - most manufacturers have them in their range. Again the cost is higher, the gains small and specific hubs are required but I'd have them if the opportunity arose, not because of fashion but because I consider rim brakes so poor.
Disc brakes are a real advantage despite their weight gain,I like the predictability of their modulation and power especially in wet and mucky conditions,which for me and I suspect many others who use them is a real plus.
They also have the advantage of no rim wear and loonngg pad life for road use,less so for MTB use but still much better than rim brakes,yes super no wear rims can be bought but at a price which far exceeds the cost of disc brakes.
My remark about lightness was a leettle tongue in cheek hence the
,because weight seems to be the be all and end all for a lot of people,when most of those people could shed 500g by carrying only one bidon,or loose one or two kgs off themselves,yet they'll pay hundreds if not thousands of £££'s to shed the same of their bikes